Istepahead Blog Featured The Right to Choose!
Featured Women Empowerment

The Right to Choose!

The management or empowerment of a woman’s actions, rights, and duties. In feminism, the phrase “the empowerment of or control over” is widely used. It gives a perspective on the capabilities and standing of specific groups of women; it describes the capacity to make decisions that directly or indirectly affect other women. Women do not need to wait for men to exercise their right to vote, for instance if they are members of a certain organisation. They also have more power over this decision because they can choose the number of children, they choose to have regardless of how it would affect others. Even though the world may not initially view women as significant, individuals who make such decisions do so in the end since changes are typically gradual and viewed as fair and reasonable.

The extent to which being a woman confers respect and importance. When use this phrase, one often refers to his or her own professional or educational history or reputation. However, this may not be sufficient to ensure equal rights for all women. Every narrative has two sides, as can be seen upon close inspection. One side seemed to be saying, “Take notice of me.” I am more important than she. Later, you get the opposite side of the story. One side of the card reads, “Look at her.” She is more significant than I am. When analysing these remarks and attempting to determine which group feels superior, it is evident that both groups are correct on some level, as there are genuinely divergent perspectives among those who assert that women and men should have equal opportunities. As a result, the definition of this phrase has led us down divergent roads, and we must now choose which perspective is optimal for everyone. I believe that by sharing experiences from our own life, we will be able to persuade ourselves to grow as individuals and examine alternative points of view, rather than continuing to fret about what others may think of us.

Although I’m certain that some people will continue to believe that “she won’t be able to accomplish anything if he merely puts his foot in front of her,” this is not the case.

A socioeconomic development that mostly benefits women without improving men’s equality. Even though women may disagree on what is advantageous, the absence of risk makes it appear less dangerous. Since it was believed that fostering equality would greatly reduce male domination, numerous programmes have been launched to achieve so. Because we believe that if all women were treated equally, there would be no need for reform, we should not disregard any initiative to improve the lives of women. Additionally, we must remember that the opposite has occurred much too often! Territorial and resource conflicts that led to the growing dominance of one side over weaker nations are an excellent historical example.

Another example is the American slave trade. Both men and women were employed. People were badly mistreated and disrespected due to a lack of equality. The United Nations was established in 1945 by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to avoid future occurrences like the slave trade. One of its key objectives is to ensure that everyone has the opportunity to live independently and without prejudice. Women are therefore welcome to participate in this treatment. They are urged to vote for politicians who will work with them to protect these liberties and other demands. Despite the fact that this agreement offers women equal access to political processes, they still face considerable barriers to professions, jobs, and other opportunities. Although the full benefits will not be realised for some time, these processes have already begun to take form.

By Mehreen Bano

Exit mobile version